Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

May 30, 2012

5 Broken Cameras; UN Me

Filed under: Film — louisproyect @ 10:47 pm

If I had to pick the essential documentary about the Palestinian struggle among the six very strong ones I’ve seen, the honors would go to “5 Broken Cameras” that opens today at the Film Forum in New York. It is exactly the sort of message that is helping to change peoples’ minds about the Middle East and deserves the widest audience.

The film derives its title from the 5 video cameras that co-director Emad Burnat has used over the years to document the struggle of his fellow villagers in Bil’in, one of the most combative in the West Bank, against Zionist settlers. Tear gas pellets or bullets that Israeli soldiers fired indiscriminately into crowds of protestors damaged most of the cameras. None of this, nor frequent house arrest, has dissuaded Burnat from soldiering on.

Burnat has an instinctive feel for cinematic transcendence, something that life under occupation rather than film school workshops can only make possible. His first camcorder was a simple affair of the kind that you take on a vacation and that he purchased to photograph his four children who are major subjects in the film, along with his wife Soraya. Under normal conditions, that is what a camcorder is used for, after all. But when ultra-orthodox Jewish settlers arrived at a state-sponsored high-rise in Bil’in, his fellow villagers relied on his film documentation of the abuses associated with occupation.

The abuses are enough to get anybody to consider the rightness of the BDS cause. The Hasidim’s brutality and arrogance will remind you of nothing else but newsreels of the Gestapo pushing around Jews in the 1930. When you see an “observant” Jew punching a nonviolent Palestinian protestor in the face, you wish for a latter-day Jeremiah to tell them “how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine.”

The Israeli soldiers are just as bad. They stand impassively on the road protecting the settlers, heavily armed and utterly lacking in humanity. Some of the more poignant scenes in “5 Broken Cameras” involve the Palestinian protestors getting in the soldiers’ faces and demanding that they act like human beings.

Bil’in is a small farming village whose main crop is the olive tree. One of the most horrifying scenes in the documentary shows the charred olive trees that were left by a settler arson attack in the middle of the night. As a powerful contrast, you see Burnat’s youngest son presenting an Israeli soldier with an olive branch. He takes it without any apparent recognition of his own violation of what the branch symbolizes through his daily actions.

Not every Israeli is a thug. We meet a good number who have come to Bil’in in solidarity, including one older man who bestows a fairly professional looking camera on Burnat. At one point, the Israeli is shot in the face by a tear gas pellet just barely missing an eye. We also see many internationalists who have rallied around the cause of Palestine just as an earlier generation rallied around the Spanish Republic.

One of the more noteworthy Israelis standing on the side of humanity is Burnat’s co-director Guy Davidi, who was an activist with Indymedia. His first documentary was “Interrupted Streams” that dealt with the Zionist theft of Palestinian water just as the latest deals with land theft.

Throughout the film, you hear Emad Burnat’s voice as he speaks eloquently about his tribulations and his hopes. Like other Palestinians, there is a note of weariness and fatalism as they see the Zionist juggernaut in action but notwithstanding that they always find a way to demonstrate their opposition to it. Perhaps no other people on earth symbolize Gramsci’s “pessimism of the intellect and optimism of the will” more graphically than the villagers of Bil’in.

In the press kit from Kino Lorber, there’s a section that deals with the 5 cameras of the title. Here’s the story on the third, something that should give you a feel for the intense nature of this year’s most compelling documentary by far:

Gibreel is now three years old, and Emad takes his kid to see the demonstrations by himself – with a third camera on his shoulders. On that day, Gibreel saw his neighbors being arrested, including one of Emad’s brothers – as the soldiers were entering more and more into the village and began taking people from their houses.

After that, soldiers entered into the village and arrested children from their homes – for throwing rocks in the demonstrations. In the morning, the kids went to demonstrate together. They cried: “We want to sleep”. But the violence continues and an Israeli activist was hurt by a bullet in the head. In his house, the kids speak about brochures the army distributed to warn people not to go and demonstrate. Soraya then had to explain to them that they had to continue resisting. And the soldiers continued to look for children to arrest.

One night, they came into Emad’s house while he was filming. Emad was taken to the police, and then, kept in jail and house arrest. In a house far from Bil’in, Emad was locked alone, accused of throwing rocks but actually punished for filming. At the end, the army dropped all charges, as they claimed lack of evidence. When he is out, Emad went directly to filming, and his third camera was again, shot at and hit. The bullet, still inside the camera, is a proof to life’s fragility.

Going from the sublime to the ridiculous, I suppose I should say a few words about the truly rancid “U.N. ME”, a title that is supposed to sound like “You and Me”, a sample of director Ami Horowitz’s lame sense of humor.

I had a feeling that this would be a rightwing screed but watched it out of curiosity. I had never seen a conservative documentary before and wondered if it would be half as amusing as a few minutes of Rush Limbaugh or the like. I don’t mind rightwing crapola in small doses, just as a way of reminding me how far off a revolution in the USA is.

Horowitz used to be an investment banker—no surprise there. The film is a diatribe against the U.N. utilizing all the expected talking points about how it is a “den of iniquity”, to use Lenin’s description of the League of Nations, but its iniquity is based on a mixture of self-seeking corruption of the kind that only a professional diplomat is capable of and coddling of terrorists and Islamic governments, Iran’s especially.

Horowitz, a truly off-putting character, has appropriated Michael Moore’s shtick wandering around the U.N. or the offices of various diplomats looking for a chance to make them look foolish. Instead, it is he who looks stupid.

While I have little use for the government of Sudan, there is one scene that encapsulates the dimwittedness of the director. He asks a government spokesman why there was so much killing in the south. When the man starts off by putting it into context by referring to global warming, the jackass director tries to make a joke about the whole thing, asking whether peace in Darfur will come if we all start driving Priuses.

One can’t imagine Ami Horowitz ever reading anything but the NY Post, but if he took the trouble, he could have learned that the Sudanese official was not far off from the truth:

The fighting in Darfur is usually described as racially motivated, pitting mounted Arabs against black rebels and civilians. But the fault lines have their origins in another distinction, between settled farmers and nomadic herders fighting over failing lands. The aggression of the warlord Musa Hilal can be traced to the fears of his father, and to how climate change shattered a way of life.

Until the rains began to fail, the sheikh’s people lived amicably with the settled farmers. The nomads were welcome passers-through, grazing their camels on the rocky hillsides that separated the fertile plots. The farmers would share their wells, and the herders would feed their stock on the leavings from the harvest. But with the drought, the farmers began to fence off their land—even fallow land—for fear it would be ruined by passing herds. A few tribes drifted elsewhere or took up farming, but the Arab herders stuck to their fraying livelihoods—nomadic herding was central to their cultural identity. (The distinction between “Arab” and “African” in Darfur is defined more by lifestyle than any physical difference: Arabs are generally herders, Africans typically farmers. The two groups are not racially distinct.)

Now, that would be a good topic for a documentary, how the violence in Darfur really got started. For that you need a brain, like the directors of “5 Broken Cameras” have, as opposed to the cabbage between Ami Horowitz’s ears.


  1. The Horowitz character sounds like a reincarnation of Meir Kahane as I’m sure you’ve heard of. My opinions of Kahane changed when I first heard him speak in Stamford decades ago. At first I thought he was misunderstood and then after reading some of his writings it began to sound like a Mein Kampf style hatred of Arabs. There are two sides to every story and I know that the Palestinians are victims who are portrayed negatively and unfairly in the Western press.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — May 30, 2012 @ 11:42 pm

  2. But to add, Kahane was nothing more than a Jewish terrorist who paid the ultimate price for his hatred of Arabs when he was assassinated in 1990. I do believe he reaped what he sowed and karma bit him back.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — May 30, 2012 @ 11:51 pm

  3. Global warming may explain weather, but it does not explain:

    1. Genocide
    2. The UN’s pattern of sex-for-food in Sudan
    3. The inability of world powers to stop the killing
    4. China’s role in Sudan

    Horowitz’s question to the government official is quite fair, and the official’s answer is meant to deflect ongoing real/actual/literal mass murder, and blame it on the global warming boogeyman.

    Comment by Gene — June 1, 2012 @ 6:42 pm

  4. Gene I agree with your comment about global warming 100 percent. Many leftists use this an issue of importance when it is obviously no more important than other leftists who want to ban soft drinks and fast food in American cities when there are issues like rising unemployment, hunger, homelessness and poverty which are of more importance to me as a leftist. World genocide, torture, wars etc. globally are more import too. My argument about Israel is that apartheid type policies toward Arabs is not going to solve problems or help in legitimate talks for peace and safety for all citizens both Jewish and Palestinian in that region. It only encourages more hatred. We should learn that hatred led to the holocaust and must not repeat history by doing the same thing to Arabs living in Israel. They deserve the same human rights as any other Israeli citizen.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 1, 2012 @ 7:17 pm

  5. Gene, you should read the article from the Atlantic I linked to. People are fighting everywhere in the world for access to clean water, including the West Bank. It will be as much as a cause of war as oil is today.

    Comment by louisproyect — June 1, 2012 @ 7:49 pm

  6. re: Gene @3:

    1. ‘Genocide’ is a highly politicized conceptual construct that seems designed to give imperialist powers an excuse to intervene in other countries when there is real or fabricated large-scale killing going on that is attributed to a government that those imperialist powers don’t like. I’m very much against the mass murder of innocents, but I’m even more against it when it’s done by capitalist states for their profit and power than when it’s done for reasons of ethnic rivalry.

    2. re: “The UN’s pattern of sex-for-food in Sudan”. I have no idea what the UN is doing in Sudan, but the UN has been an instrument of imperialist domination going back to the forced partition of Palestine in 1947 and the American war against Korea in 1950-1953 to the cover for imperialist aggression against Libya in 2011 and the ongoing occupation of Haiti.

    3. re: “The inability of world powers to stop the killing”. Much of the mass killing that has gone on in the world and is still going on is the work of the United States and its allies and clients. The largest mass murder by direct violence (as opposed to violently-imposed capitalist austerity) in the world in the last few decades has been the killing of well over 5 million people in the Eastern Congo by the U.S.-backed governments of Rwanda and Uganda and their collaborators. The big problem is not the inability of world powers like the U.S., Britain and France to stop the killing being done by others, but their unwillingness to stop doing the killing that they have been doing.

    4. re: “China’s role in Sudan”. It couldn’t be nearly as problematic as the U.S. role in any of a few dozen countries.

    Comment by Red Snapper — June 3, 2012 @ 9:21 am

  7. Red Snapper comment no. 6 well written and so true unfortunately. I find it laughable when the US government talks about other countries at the UN and their policies on human rights and dictatorships when our government has a poor human rights record of its own. Hypocrisy at its worst.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 3, 2012 @ 4:31 pm

  8. To whomever wrote this critique of U.N. me. I will only quote on one phrase from your critique. “I had never seen a conservative documentary before…” Doesn’t that say it all about your “impartiality”? I actually sympathize with the Palestinians, and I also watched “U.N. me”. good points, but not particularly well presented. But its shortcomings don’t come close to your utter insanity of attributing the Darfur slaughter to “global warming”.

    Comment by David Jermann — June 3, 2012 @ 9:13 pm

  9. The point is not that before global warming there was amity between north and south Sudan. Instead it is that the latest episode seems very much related to a crisis ignited by a drought that most experts attribute to climate change. For a thorough analysis of Sudan’s troubles, see this:



    Comment by louisproyect — June 3, 2012 @ 9:31 pm

  10. Nobody mentioning Sudan here seems to realize that the North-South war and the Darfur conflict are two almost entirely different things. The desertification of the North of Darfur did clearly drive the nomadic herders into conflict with the settled farmers, and the central government in Khartoum played a secondary role there, trying to put down an armed uprising, or several armed uprisings, by organized groups, some of them, at least, backed by French imperialism in neighboring Chad. It is not a racial or ethnic conflict, unless being nomadic vs. settled defines an ethnic difference. Also, there has not been mass killing of non-combatants by the government, and certainly nothing comparable to the U.S.-backed counterinsurgency campaigns in Guatemala and El Salvador in the 1980’s, nor anything that can reasonably be called ‘genocide’.

    The Zionist-dominated Save Darfur ‘movement’, BTW, seems to be little more than an anti-Arab propaganda operation that has done nothing for the people of Darfur.

    As for the North-South conflict, I’m certainly no expert — not even close! But a few things are worth noting:

    1) The control of oil is a big issue in the conflict. Most of the oil apparently is in the South or in a contested region on the border between North and South.

    2) There is a clear racial difference between the North and South, with the Northerners tending to be lighter-skinned Arabs (though not what most Europeans would consider ‘white’)and the Southerners, Black. And the latter do, to a large extent, see the conflict as a racial issue.

    3) China backs the (Northern-dominated) central government while the U.S., Israel and allied countries (including U.S. client Uganda to the south) back the opposition to that government. Another U.S. client, Ethiopia, has a very long border with Sudan on the East and Southeast, but I haven’t heard anything yet about any Ethiopian involvement in the conflict.

    4) There has been serious, violent internal conflict in the South. I have not, however, been keeping up on it so I can’t say anything useful about it.

    I think it’s important to constantly remind people who think that Western intervention in Darfur or Sudan would be justified on humanitarian grounds that by far the greatest amount of violence in that part of the world in the last 20 years has been perpetrated by the Western-backed governments of Uganda and Rwanda, along with mostly-Western capitalist resource extractors, in the Eastern Congo.

    Comment by Red Snapper — June 4, 2012 @ 7:48 am

  11. […] his people’s struggle despite all sorts of odds, including the broken cameras. Reviewed at https://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/5-broken-cameras-un-me/, https://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/tears-of-gaza-in-my-mothers-arms/ and […]

    Pingback by Best films of 2012 « Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist — January 12, 2013 @ 2:45 pm

  12. […] 5 Broken Cameras: terrific documentary about Palestinian’s effort to tell about his people’s struggle. The director was hassled at the LA airport. https://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/5-broken-cameras-un-me/ […]

    Pingback by 2012 movie consumer’s guide | Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist — February 25, 2013 @ 1:24 am

  13. For documentaries on Palestine, I still haven’t seen anything to beat Juliano Mer-Khamis’s astonishing ARNA’S CHILDREN: the most moving, the most militant, the most artful thing I’ve seen on Palestine, made even more so by the recent assassination of the director, the son of two Israeli communist party stalwarts, one a Jew, one a Palestinian Israeli.

    Comment by Jim Holstun — February 27, 2013 @ 11:47 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: