Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist

June 2, 2012

Pink Ribbons Inc.; Living Downstream; The Education of Dee Dee Ricks

Filed under: Ecology,health and fitness — louisproyect @ 10:50 pm

Yesterday the must-see documentary “Pink Ribbons Inc.” opened at the IFC Center in NY. The film was released well before the news broke that the Susan G. Komen Foundation had stopped funding Planned Parenthood because it provided abortion services. If you think the Komen’s main offense was fetus fetishism, as radical feminists used to put it in the 1970s, you haven’t see the worst of it. This powerful mixture of investigative journalism and cultural analysis lies bare the truly sinister partnership of “cause marketing” and the rotten corporations seeking to exploit women’s suffering from an epidemic largely spawned by corporate America.

The film is based on Samantha King’s “Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy”. King, one of the primary interviewees, is joined by a number of other experts on the subject, including women who have survived breast cancer. As a way of showing what the radical critique of corporate philanthropy is up against, the film also interviews Nancy G. Brinker, the CEO and founder of Komen, as well as a number of the corporate chieftains who have teamed up with her.

The most riveting figure among all the interviewees is Barbara Ehrenreich, the long-time socialist journalist and educator who wrote about her own encounter with the disease in an article titled “Welcome to Cancerland” that appeared in the November 2001 Harper’s Magazine.

My official induction into breast cancer comes about ten days later with the biopsy, which, for reasons I cannot ferret out of the surgeon, has to be a surgical one, performed on an outpatient basis but under general anesthesia, from which I awake to find him standing perpendicular to me, at the far end of the gurney, down near my feet, stating gravely, “Unfortunately, there is a cancer.” It takes me all the rest of that drug-addled day to decide that the most heinous thing about that sentence is not the presence of cancer but the absence of me — for I, Barbara, do not enter into it even as a location, a geographical reference point. Where I once was — not a commanding presence perhaps but nonetheless a standard assemblage of flesh and words and gesture — “there is a cancer.” I have been replaced by it, is the surgeon’s implication. This is what I am now, medically speaking.

Ehrenreich is a compelling personality. Her saturnine observations on the medical profession, the pink ribbon industry, her personal drama, and the class dimensions of the epidemic, are worth the price of the admission. But there are some other eye-opening interviews that should be singled out.

Like Ehrenreich, Barbara A. Brenner is a sharp critic of American society and a breast cancer survivor. As Executive Director of Breast Cancer Action, she mobilizes women and men against the type of incestuous relationship that the Komen foundation cultivates with corporate behemoths that produce carcinogenic commodities. When Brenner learned that Kentucky Fried Chicken had hooked up with Komen to give 50 cents to the foundation for every pink bucket of fried chicken that was sold, she launched a campaign directed against KFC and Komen named “What the Cluck?” that effectively put the kibosh on one of the more grotesque examples of “cause marketing”.

One of the more poignant moments in the film that amply demonstrates its class loyalties involves the handful of women organized as The Plastics Focus Group. These are women who worked in factories molding plastic car parts. As part of a research study on the ties between chemicals in the workplace to breast cancer, they described a battery of never-ending chemical assaults that left them feeling ill much of the time. While nosebleeds are bad enough on a daily basis, nothing prepared them for the cancer that would eventually destroy their lives.

One of the main points made in “Pink Ribbons Inc.” is that the Komen Foundation devotes very little resources to prevention, especially through the much needed campaigns against corporate polluters like Ford Motors that victimized the women working on plastic molding at the very time it was exploiting its ties to Komen. That, of course, would be tantamount to biting the hand that feeds it.

Ironically, the pink ribbon itself was thought up by someone very cognizant of the role of carcinogens unleashed by capitalist production. The documentary interviews Charlotte Haley, whose daughter, sister and grandmother all had breast cancer. She began handing out salmon-colored ribbons at grocery stores with cards stating, “The National Cancer Institute annual budget is $1.8 billion, only 5 percent goes for cancer prevention. Help us wake up our legislators and America by wearing this ribbon.” For as long as she has been involved with breast cancer issues, Haley has always emphasized the likely environmental causes of a disease that has become an epidemic after WWII when American industry began to pump out enormous quantities of carcinogens, the carbon based materials that while cheap are deadly.

Anticipating that “Pink Ribbons Inc.” would deal with the question of the corporate role in making women sick, I read Sandra Steingraber’s “Living Downstream: an ecologist looks at cancer in the environment”, a book that I purchased in 1997 when it first came out. To give you a sense of its provenance, you can read this blurb by Richard Levins on the back cover: “Sandra Steingraber’s ‘upstream’ approach to cancer is imperative. It is about time someone wrote this book.” Levins, as you might know, is one of America’s most respected Marxist biologists.

Born in 1959, Steingraber grew up in rural Illinois surrounded by corn and soybean fields that were drenched by chemical pesticides and herbicides. In her 20s, when studying biology, she developed bladder cancer, a disease that is not usually found among the young but is endemic to the kind of workplaces that The Plastic Focus Group endured. The book is written as a kind of memoir and investigative journalism that revolves around her return to her hometown and the various places that might have led to her disease.

Put simply, “Living Downstream” is a latter-day “The Silent Spring”, with frequent nods to Rachel Carson who died of breast cancer, likely from the sort of chemical causes that impacted Steingraber as well. Steingraber is not only a highly accomplished researcher; she is also a deeply gifted writer, as this excerpt should illustrate:

Bean fields are humble; they start out that way and stay that way. For reasons I can’t explain, they are also a little bit sad. Walking through a soybean field, I feel like myself, only sadder. A soybean is a delicate plant. Like all other legumes—clover, peas, alfalfa—the soybean plant has a softness in its leaves. Fully grown, it is mostly shaped like a little bush that never extends much above the thighs, but, late in the season, an inconspicuous twining reveals its origin as an Asian vine. In spite of their modesty, the high-yielding varieties of soybeans are given brawny names—Jack, Burlison, Pharoah—that sound like brands of condoms.

As it turns out, 99 percent of corn and soybeans in Illinois were sprayed with herbicides by 1993. Although they have been shown to produce chromosome damage in lab animals, it is difficult to establish a direct connection between the chemicals and breast or ovarian cancer, their likely cause in rural Illinois. That, of course, is the loophole that corporate America exploits. Their “experts” demand proof that dioxins or PCB’s cause cancer, when the exact moment when a cell mutates is impossible to pinpoint. For that matter, the exact cause of cancer is still not known, nor may never be known since cancer is not exactly caused in the same way as, for example, malaria is caused by a mosquito’s bite.

Cancer has been around for as long as homo sapiens, but it is only in the more recent past, as industry has become more and more carcinogenic, that it has become the widespread menace that confronts humanity. If there is any stronger motivation for abolishing the capitalist system than eliminating a profit motive that makes pollution the threat it is to life and limb, I certainly can’t name it.

Let me conclude with a few words about a documentary that was aired recently on HBO and that can be seen on-demand if you are a subscriber. Titled “The Education of Dee Dee Ricks”, it is the story of a woman best described as out of the cast of Bravo’s “Housewives of New York”. (I watch such shows with my wife from time to time, I confess, because they are a lot funnier than most of the situation comedies on network TV.) If you don’t think that unrepentant Marxists have any business watching such garbage, let me advise you that the top-drawer Bookforum has a pretty positive review of Bravo executive Andy Cohen’s memoir. On second thought, I’ll watch garbage if I feel like it, so there.

Anyhow, Ricks has it all. She lives in a 14 million dollar apartment, is a young-looking 39, endowed with natural blond hair and a statuesque body. In other words, she has all the privileges and much of the seeming shallowness of the Bravo housewives.

Like the petty-minded bureaucrat in Kurosawa’s “Ikiru”, she learns out of the blue one day that she has cancer. Her illness, like that character’s, gives her a new and more uplifted perspective on life. From observing the exclusively white and privileged nature of the women receiving treatment at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Hospital (a place I worked in the 1980s), she decides to become a fundraiser for a clinic in Harlem that caters to Black women in the community who die from breast cancer at a rate 5 to 8 times that of whites.

The film is very graphic in its depiction of Ricks’s surgery and aftermath—she undergoes a double mastectomy and 8 rounds of chemotherapy. Throughout it all, she continues to raise money for the clinic and becomes close friends, almost like a sister, with Cynthia Dodson, a Black woman who has stage-4 breast cancer.

This is a poignant study of the solidarity that emerges between women enduring a dreaded disease and a partial explanation for the appeal that the Komen foundation has for many women. Indeed, Ricks is seen giving a testimonial to Dodson at a Komen fundraising dinner.

If you do not have HBO, keep an eye out for this documentary if it ever makes other venues since it is a very inspiring film about women dealing with their number one health threat in this epoch.

13 Comments »

  1. You might want to mention that Pink Ribbons Inc was produced by the National Film Board of Canada.

    Comment by emmryss — June 2, 2012 @ 11:32 pm

  2. As you said exposure to chemicals and cancer causing agents is a problem with corporate America and the corrupt capitalist government of ours that continue to deregulate and not police companies that are slowly killing all of us with their poisons. It wouldn’t surprise me if Komen took contributions from Phillip Morris, Inc. and saying they made a deal with the devil (cigarette manufacturers that produce a carcinogenic product) to save lives. That analogy I used just shows how low they sink in the name of saving lives. It’s all bullshit anyway. Why cure cancer when there’s so much money being made off it with doctors, technicians, hospitals, device makers, pharmaceutical companies are just some who make huge profits off of those suffering with the disease? And the funeral parlors when the patient finally loses the battle make a nice profit too. It’s an enterprise you know capitalism at work. Ain’t America great?

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 3, 2012 @ 3:03 am

  3. Cancer is a greed driven capitalist enterprise where there’s money to be made so people in America are kidding theirselves if they think any organization is ACTUALLY doing REAL research for a cure. I say this in memory of my father who died of pancreatic cancer, a disease that’s very low on the government’s priority list for research, though it’s the most deadly of all cancers.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 3, 2012 @ 4:31 am

  4. Sorry for the typo I meant Americans are kidding themselves in my post no. 3 but since it’s after midnight here and I’m tired I say goodnight fellow marxists lol.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 3, 2012 @ 4:37 am

  5. Great review Louis. As a fellow Marxist in the environmental health field, however, I must point out that carcinogens don’t only include carbon-based chemicals. Many of the most potent carcinogens (arsenic, silica, chromium, asbestos, etc.) are not carbon-based.

    Comment by justin — June 3, 2012 @ 7:01 pm

  6. There are pockets in the rural Midwest with high rates of cancer almost certainly the result of nuclear testing fall out, which clumped unpredictably around the US. Overall we are talking 10000′s early deaths. Some in Tom Harkin’s family died early of bizarre cancers.

    Comment by purple — June 4, 2012 @ 1:28 am

  7. Comment no. 6 purple that’s right the government did do this type of testing in certain parts or pockets in the country but what I find most astonishing is the scientific experts and government officials who I’m sure were very aware of the fact that radiation can take on average 50 years to begin to dissipate, but yet did it anyway without a care for the citizens who lived near these testing areas or what future harm this would cause these people and the generations that would follow. But I’m sure the government will claim there’s no connection between the cancers and the testing. It’s common knowledge that exposure to high levels of radiation causes cancer usually appearing decades later.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 4, 2012 @ 2:22 am

  8. I have to say along these lines no one will ever touch Dan Pallotta. He’s essentially batting cleanup – we’ve eliminated the safety net, but there’s still the moderate tax advantages of, you know, real charities that don’t pay themselves all the money they raise and stuff. it’s like the social security trust fund – it’s kind of just lying there. A documentary that showed the aftermath of his dry-up-the-well fundraising approach would be a true service to humanity.

    Comment by Marion Delgado — June 4, 2012 @ 9:07 am

  9. Good point Marion comment no. 8. Not all non-profits or charities spend parts of donations on salaries and overhead. A great non-profit that I will plug is the Lustgarten Foundation who uses 100 percent of every dollar donated on pancreatic cancer. They are trying to develop an early detection test because the cancer is generally discovered at an advanced stage with an average life expectancy of 3 months or less. My father was diagnosed on a Wednesday and died two days later on Friday. This cancer is the deadliest and it kills fast. I applaud the Lustgarten Foundation’s efforts to develop a test and cure for this deadly disease.

    Comment by Deborah Jeffries — June 4, 2012 @ 9:30 pm

  10. I am a “Life Survivor” who happened to be diagnosed with breast cancer 17 mos ago and underwent a bi lateral masectomy, chemo and reconstruction. My angst toward foundations like Komen runs deep. How much of each dollar raised in the color pink actually descends to the places or people who need it? I was asked to speak at a Relay for Life kick off for the American Cancer Society and spoke from my heart as follows… “if it makes you feel good to write a check, understand you did nothing. If you want to truly do something “adopt” a woman who needs someone to go to chemo or radiation with, a woman who can’t afford to purchase a wig, a woman who needs a hand to hold or a Kleenex to dry her eyes. Make a Mac and Cheese casserole to take to someone who needs to eat and can’t. Get your hands dirty and the satisfaction earned will far outweigh that check you might have written. Feel Good moments come from the heart and are best when couppled with strength of actions.” I am not breast cancer nor am I its survivor… I survived much worse than cancer in my life and will again.

    Comment by Jeanne Fisherkeller — June 7, 2012 @ 3:14 pm

  11. Louis – I represent Dee Dee Ricks and I’m wondering if you may be interested in doing a separate entry on her and the advocacy work she is doing this October, Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Please email me at annie@pacepublicrelations.com!

    Comment by Annie Scranton — September 24, 2012 @ 6:27 pm

  12. [...] June I wrote a highly complementary review of the book that [...]

    Pingback by Creeped out by Sandra Steingraber « Louis Proyect: The Unrepentant Marxist — October 22, 2012 @ 8:30 pm

  13. [...] June I wrote a highly complementary review of the book that [...]

    Pingback by Creeped out by Sandra Steingraber | Socialist Agenda WebzineSocialist Agenda Webzine — October 22, 2012 @ 9:26 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,537 other followers

%d bloggers like this: